SB2011011302 - Multiple vulnerabilities in GNU Glibc
Published: January 13, 2011 Updated: August 11, 2020
Breakdown by Severity
- Low
- Medium
- High
- Critical
Description
This security bulletin contains information about 5 secuirty vulnerabilities.
1) Configuration (CVE-ID: CVE-2011-1089)
The vulnerability allows a remote non-authenticated attacker to read and manipulate data.
The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file, which makes it easier for local users to trigger corruption of this file, as demonstrated by writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0296.
2) Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls (CVE-ID: CVE-2011-1658)
The vulnerability allows a remote non-authenticated attacker to read and manipulate data.
ld.so in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier expands the $ORIGIN dynamic string token when RPATH is composed entirely of this token, which might allow local users to gain privileges by creating a hard link in an arbitrary directory to a (1) setuid or (2) setgid program with this RPATH value, and then executing the program with a crafted value for the LD_PRELOAD environment variable, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-3847 and CVE-2011-0536. NOTE: it is not expected that any standard operating-system distribution would ship an applicable setuid or setgid program.
3) Input validation error (CVE-ID: CVE-2011-1659)
The vulnerability allows a remote non-authenticated attacker to perform service disruption.
Integer overflow in posix/fnmatch.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a long UTF8 string that is used in an fnmatch call with a crafted pattern argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1071.
4) Input validation error (CVE-ID: CVE-2010-4051)
The vulnerability allows a remote non-authenticated attacker to perform service disruption.
The regcomp implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.11.3, and 2.12.x through 2.12.2, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a regular expression containing adjacent bounded repetitions that bypass the intended RE_DUP_MAX limitation, as demonstrated by a {10,}{10,}{10,}{10,}{10,} sequence in the proftpd.gnu.c exploit for ProFTPD, related to a "RE_DUP_MAX overflow."
5) Resource management error (CVE-ID: CVE-2010-4052)
The vulnerability allows a remote non-authenticated attacker to perform service disruption.
Stack consumption vulnerability in the regcomp implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.11.3, and 2.12.x through 2.12.2, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a regular expression containing adjacent repetition operators, as demonstrated by a {10,}{10,}{10,}{10,} sequence in the proftpd.gnu.c exploit for ProFTPD.
Remediation
Install update from vendor's website.
References
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:178
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:179
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1526.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46740
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667974
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66820
- http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=48733
- http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/02/i-got-accidental-code-execution-via.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44353
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12583
- http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=8126d90480fa3e0c5c5cd0d02cb1c93174b45485
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025450
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681054
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66819
- http://cxib.net/stuff/proftpd.gnu.c
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jan/78
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42547
- http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/93
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8003
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024832
- http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15935
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912279
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/515589/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45233
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645859